Now that we are officially in the midst of a recession, commentators have begun to speculate how the economic downturn could affect crime rates.
Some claim there is no link between recessions and increased crime. People in this camp rely on U.S. Justice Department statistics that show crime flourished during the 1920’s, 1950’s and 1960’s-when the economy was also booming. But wouldn’t one expect that during hard times, people who are suffering would steal to compensate for their lack of income? While there have been reports of increased incidents of shoplifting during recessions, there may be counteractive forces at work which balance the overall property crime rate. For instance, during economic downturns, people often move in with relatives and stay home more, both of which tend to have a stabilizing effect.
Others have found a strong link between economic downturns and crime waves. Those who believe this theory claim that statistics can be skewed by a number of forces. For example, in the 1990s, when Michigan’s Ecorse Police Department retrieved dead human bodies from the Detroit River and classified them as “floating bodies,” the crimes weren’t recorded in the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report since that crime category wasn’t recognized. Additionally, crime rates during the Depression may have been distorted by Federal Government programs such as the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). In the 1930’s, the CCC took over 500,000 unemployed young men (who pose the greatest risk of committing crimes) from cities and moved them to isolated work camps where they lacked the opportunity to commit crimes. Without these measures, would there have been a rise in crime during the Depression? Who knows. . . .
While the relationship between recessions and violent and property crime is debatable, it makes sense that certain crimes do in fact rise in tandem with hard economic times. Specifically, domestic violence, alcohol-fueled crimes, and elder abuse have reportedly been increasing as families struggle with the stress of the current recession.
What can be done? While state budgets may be strapped, it may be cost-efficient to implement educational programs in order to prevent an increase in domestic crimes. Another preventative measure: don’t cut police department budgets! If there aren’t sufficient officers in place, criminals will have more opportunities to offend. And if the effects of decreased security resources illustrated by the recent holiday shopping tragedies are any indication, we cannot afford to under-fund law enforcement.
The Juice is no longer loose. But if he’d taken a last minute deal offered by prosecutors, he would have been loose a lot sooner. OJ’s friend Thomas Scotto is
Recently,
It is long standing precedent that prosecutors must release evidence to the defense that is exculpatory or relevant to punishment. If they don’t, however, they are rarely disciplined. Why should prosecutors get away with this when they are the ones supposedly charged with upholding the law?
Recently, OJ Simpson was found guilty of 12 criminal charges, including armed 
Remember all those huge tobacco settlements? Those were the days… oh wait they’re still around! The Supreme Court recently heard arguments-for the third time-in a tobacco case stemming all the way from a 10 year old $79.5 million jury verdict against Philip Morris in Oregon. A lot has happened since then-Phillip Morris has changed its name, we’ve had three presidents, and the Oregon Supreme Court
Recently, Wolfe Law Group brought a lawsuit in the
Lori Drew’s jury is speaking to the press, and some are not happy. The forewoman of the Jury in Lori Drew’s trial gave this interesting quote to Wired’s
Lori Drew, the mother whose Myspace shenanigans led to the suicide of 13 year old Megan Meier in 2007, was recently convicted in federal court with accessing protected computers without authorization, a 