A 2008 study found that 58% of Americans do not have a will.  I find this number to be shocking.  I know that death and dying is an unwelcome topic, however dying without a will is a really bad idea.  This holds true whether you are worth millions or a lot less.  Wills, trusts, and other estate planning tools give you the power to decide how to distribute your estate.

When an individual dies without a will (or when they have an incomplete will), their estate goes through intestacy, which basically means the state decides how your estate will be distributed.  This is especially risky if you have step or adopted children as some state’s do not allow an adopted or stepchild to inherit in intestacy, or those non-biological children inherit less.

A recent article I read outlines the top 9 excuses for people gave for not making any type of estate plan:

(1)I don’t see a need for an estate plan

(2)I don’t plan on dying

(3)I don’t plan on dying – at least not soon

(4)I don’t want to pay for it

(5)I don’t want to spend the time

(6)I don’t want to talk about my family

(7)I don’t want to talk about my money

(8)I don’t want to ruin my kids

(9)I don’t trust my kids

As you can see, some of these excuses are just avoiding the inevitable.  One of the beauties of estate planning is that you have the ability to change the majority of your plan as situations change.  Without an estate plan, you are putting your finances and property at the mercy of a judge who has no idea what you and your family are like.

A recent LegalMatch study found that the majority of people interested in preparing for their future were more interested in overall estate planning than drafting a single will or trust.  These findings make sense in that those individuals that are thinking about wills and estate planning are really trying to maximize the benefits and thus are creating more complicated schemes than just a will or trust; and those individuals who are not are in the majority and doing nothing to plan.   In addition to the ability to specifically provide for your family and loved ones, there are tremendous tax benefits to creating a will and/or trust.

It is not necessarily that I think everyone needs to embrace their own death.  Rather, I am advocating for embracing the lives you will leave on your death.  Estate planning is such a powerful tool and for all the time that people spend worrying about money and their families in their lives they should take a little time and worry about them after they die too.

Estate Planning Procrastination Rampant is a post from: LegalMatch Law Blog

All great sentiments, truly, they really are.  They’re clichéd, but nice nonetheless.  Sucks though that they don’t always hold up to the reality of life.  Even though none of this applies to me, as my family and life as a blogger are both perfect.  There’s a reason why half of all marriages end in divorce and why every time most people hear of the prospect of having to endure another annual family reunion at Bennigan’s causes them to hightail it to the corner store to pick up a case of Jack.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure everyone loves their family, in theory.  But there are just so many things that can cause a person to want to break off all ties with them.  Forgetting to pick up groceries, annoying grooming habits, obnoxious personalities, not shutting your bedroom door at night after coming in when you’ve specifically told them that the noise from the outside will keep you up and you have to get up early the next day…

Anyway, not all disputes end with a broken home, most are trivial matters that are usually resolved with a simple conversation or, at most, a jagged bread knife.  However, if I were a betting man (which according to the judge, I’m no longer allowed to be) I’d put my lifesavings on money being the main culprit in tearing families apart.  And in no situation is this truism more apparent then when it comes to wills.

Recent statistics from LegalMatch show approximately a third of all disputes involving wills come from clients asserting claims that they should’ve been a recipient in a person’s will.  Half of the cases involve heirs attempting to protect their interests against another party trying to take their interests away.  The values in these cases vary widely from a few thousand dollars to sometimes a few million dollars.

But what makes these cases difficult to resolve is that in nearly 40 percent of them no formal will was ever written, leaving the family to squabble over their loved one’s estate amongst themselves.  However, even though written wills exist in the majority of these disputes, the same issues still arise.

Sounds pretty grim, huh?  What’s a person to do, especially if you are the one who’s will such a future conflict may be concerning?  The most obvious solution is to try and talk everything out among the people involved.  Whether it’s your will or not, it’s always good to clear things up between those you love.  Because chances are unless your last name is Cleaver, your family probably isn’t perfect and there’s a lot of things that fester because they go unsaid – usually resulting in a beautifully tragic emotional explosion.

The other thing you can do is hire a good estate lawyer to write a tight and clear will.  Though it’s true in this day and age it seems like anyone can sue for anything regardless of how frivolous, a clean unambiguously written document still holds a lot of sway with the courts.  This means a well-written will not only ensures that the person leaving behind his estate gets the security of knowing his last wishes will be carried out to his liking, but that there would be less chance for those looking to modify those wishes to be successful at it.

Either that or you can just do what you want with your money now and leave those money-grubbing descendents weeping.

Peace When You’re Dead? Pipe Dream, Just a Pipe Dream… is a post from: LegalMatch Law Blog

Contributing to this significant transfer of assets is an increase in the number of will contests being brought today, particularly as it relates to step-families.  Children of these families are rapidly learning that the second (or third) spouse often has significant if not greater rights than the children; intestacy shares can range from 1/3^rd to as much as ½ of the decedent’s estate when there is no will.  (Before Your Parent’s Say ‘I Do’ Again)

Even when there is a will, sometimes a new spouse will change not only the family dynamics but also the dynamics of the will or family trust.  Most Americans are familiar with Anna Nicole Smith’s short-lived marriage and protracted court battles that continue even after her death. (Daughter to Inherit Mother’s Estate ).  Anna’s litigation, however, is not atypical although most people’s estate assets are significantly less than the Marshall fortune.

In fact, some children are proactively approaching their parents about their estate plans before their parents die.  SmartMoney.com profiles Neil Finkel whose 80+ year-old father placed a large percent of his multi-million dollar estate into a trust for his son.  However, Finkel’s Dad married a woman 30 years his junior. Amy, the new spouse, and Neil subsequently waged a 2-year court battle over the father’s dwindling assets which were being eroded by the spending habits of the new wife.  Although the case was settled, it’s unlikely that the rift in the family will be healed and it could erupt again after Dad Finkel’s death.  (Before Your Parent’s Say ‘I Do’ Again)

During the past five years, tens of thousands of people have used LegalMatch to find an attorney to represent them in filing a lawsuit to contest a will or to defend the estate against a will contest.  Not surprisingly, many of the most popular states for will contests have a high concentration of residents age 65+.  Plus, this top 10 state list comprises over 55% of LegalMatch’s will contest customers: 

Your will or trust will have lasting implications on your heirs after your death, particularly in those families where there are step-children or multiple spouses.  Probate litigation is generally protracted and can tear families asunder.  Developing a proactive estate plan, even if your estate assets are small, should help to reduce family tension after your death.  However your estate plan is crafted, you will be communicating a strong message to your family. The properly drafted will can stand the tests of probate court and ensure that your intent is followed after death.

Where There’s a Will, There’s a Way? is a post from: LegalMatch Law Blog

According to LegalMatch case data from the past 5 years, 61% of people claiming an interest in the estate of the decedent (the person who dies) involve a written will.  Most commonly, children brought these lawsuits (43%); parents (16%), grandkids (9%) and spouses (5%) were less likely to take legal action. 

So, why are these wills being challenged?  People seek to prevent or stop a will from being probated for a number of reasons.  Commonly, plaintiffs claim that:  1) the will reflects a mistake of the testator, 2) the testator wrote his will under undue influence, fraud, or duress, or 3) the testator lacked testamentary intent or the capacity to write his will in the first place.

While a minority (23%) of the LegalMatch will contests that I evaluated involved decedents who died intestate (without a written will), according to a 2007 Harris poll, 55% of U.S. adults don’t have a will or estate plan.  This trend is even more prevalent among minorities: only 32% of African Americans and 25% of Hispanic Americans have wills, compared with 52% of White Americans. 

According to the same Harris poll, however, more Americans are making living wills (also known as health care directives), perhaps in response to widely publicized disputes such as the Terry Schiavo case.  Respondents’ number one reason for not making a will?  They thought they didn’t have enough assets to worry about.  Other popular responses were:  1) I don’t want to think about dying or being incapacitated, 2) I don’t know who to ask about drafting a will, and 3) procrastination. 

While crafting your will to withstand legal challenge may seem complicated, a good lawyer should be able to do this competently.  However, there is one simple thing that all laypersons can do: make your will accessible!  I found that 17% of LegalMatch will contests indicated that the parties did not even know if a will existed!  Remember, even the most carefully drafted will won’t do a bit of good if it can’t be found. 

Maybe the knowledge that their children will most likely be the ones to hash things out in court will motivate parents to start drafting their wills with care.  Also, while it’s troubling to know that so many people leave their estates unsettled, it’s also comforting to know that legal action can be taken even if the decedent fails to leave a will or alert his loved ones that a will exists at all.

Where There’s a Will (or No Will), There’s a Legal Way is a post from: LegalMatch Law Blog

The Illinois case, In re Estate of Max Feinberg has drawn national attention and raises thorny issues, including how individual freedoms should be interpreted in a post-civil rights world. 

In Feinberg, the Illinois Supreme Court invalidated a trust provision that attempted to disinherit certain beneficiaries if they married persons who were not Jewish.  The court found that the clause violated public policy as discouraging marriage.  Most states hold that provisions discouraging marriage or encouraging divorce violate public policy; however, there’s no consensus on faith-based restrictive clauses.  For example, in Shapira v. Union National Bank, an Ohio court upheld a provision requiring the decedent’s son to marry a Jewish woman within seven years of the testator’s death in order to collect his inheritance. 

According to Restatement Third of Trusts, the Feinberg provision is clearly invalid.  The Restatement specifies that a provision eliminating a beneficiary’s rights to a trust if he marries someone outside a designated religion is void as a violation of public policy.  The Restatement clarifies: trust provisions are generally invalid if they “encourage disruption of a family relationship . . . discourage formation or resumption of such a relationship . . . [or] seriously interfere with or inhibit” the beneficiary’s freedom to divorce or marry “by limiting the beneficiary’s selection of a spouse.”  Given how the provision in question has caused major turmoil within the Feinberg family, it would be invalid under the Restatement.

If Feinberg goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, I hope the Justices will give strong consideration to the fact that the clause does not put the grandchildren’s fundamental right to marry at stake; instead, it merely threatens their inheritance.  Furthermore, a testators’ freedom to dispose of their personal property as they wish has long been respected.  Do we really want to whittle away at this freedom?

For Better or Worse: The “Jewish Marriage Clause” Debate Marches On is a post from: LegalMatch Law Blog